2014 UT App 230 - State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Clark · State v. Nuttall · Smith v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel may have thought that it might play well for [d]efendant to accept a restitution award in excess of the damages for which he admitted he was 'absolutely responsible'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jamieson“no reasonable person could adopt the view of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.