2014 UT App 233 - Widdison v. Widdison’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6103
Relies on State v. Ramirez · 2008 UT App 11 - Stonehocker v. Stonehocker · Rucker v. Dalton · 2010 UT App 139 - Connell v. Connell · Wilde v. Wilde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a material issue, we assume the court found them in accord with its decision, and we affirm the decision if from the evidence it would be reasonable to find facts to support it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dole v. Dole“had no explanation for her position, particularly where it would cost her nothing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has substantially prevailed on all disputed issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.