Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UTAPP 244 - Nebeker v. Summit County

Nebeker v. Summit County’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las Vegas · State v. Nielsen · J.M.W. v. T.I.Z. · Kimball v. Kimball · B.R. v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the legal relationship between the parties, the foreseeability of injury, the likelihood of injury, public policy as to which party can best bear the loss occasioned by the injury, and other general policy considerations,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Even if a careful analysis of [pertinent case law] might convince us that the facts of this case mandate one result or the other, we will not conduct that analysis on a party's behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “step outside our role as a neutral reviewing body and assume the burden of argument and research”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.