2014 UT App 255 - State v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rimmasch · State v. Larsen · Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc. · State v. S.H. · State v. Robison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not tell the jury that the transaction at issue was a security, couch his opinion specifically in terms of what is required under Utah law, or otherwise tell the jury what conclusion to reach”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Judge Pearce's concerns regarding the admissibility of the State's expert testimony with respect to the materiality”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the questions presented to the jury concerning materiality in this case were straightforward,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.