Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UT App 296 - State v. Ochoa

2014 UT App 296 - State v. Ochoa’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Neder v. United States · United States v. Cotton · Alleyne v. United States · Washington v. Recuenco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A reviewing court attempting to determine whether the omission of an element from a jury instruction is harmless error 'asks whether the record contains evidence that could rationally lead to a contrary finding with respect to the omitted element.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “intends to commit the crime; or ... when causing a particular result is an element of the crime, he acts with an awareness that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause that result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.