Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 Ark. App. 205 - Pedraza v. State

2015 Ark. App. 205 - Pedraza v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on London v. State · Sawyer v. State · Johnson v. Dawson · 68 Ark. App. 313 - Carmical v. McAfee · Sullivan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The legislature is presumed to be familiar with the appellate courts' interpretation of its statutes, and it can amend a statute if it disagrees with those interpretations; absent such an amendment, the interpretation of the statute remains the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.