Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 ILAPP(3D) 130077 - People v. Ross

People v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Padilla v. Kentucky · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “remand is required, regardless of whether the claims raised in the petition had merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.