State v. Favel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

94 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A mere assertion that constitutional rights are implicated or that failure to review the claimed error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice is insufficient to implicate the plain error doctrine.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Reinert · State v. Clemans

2. “firmly convince this Court that failure to review the claimed error would result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the trial or proceedings, or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. T. Ferris

3. “We review an unpreserved claim, under the common law plain error doctrine, at our discretion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. T. Ferris