Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 ND 101 - State v. Jasmann

State v. Jasmann’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Olander · State v. Erickstad · State v. Kruckenberg · State v. Clark · State v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, this Court must first determine whether the prosecutor’s actions were misconduct and, if they were, then .... examine whether the misconduct had prejudicial effect. [Pjrosecutorial misconduct may so infect the trial vtfth unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process. This Court applies a de novo standard of review when determining whether facts rise to the level of a constitutional violation, including a claim that prosecutorial misconduct denied a defendant’s due process right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.