Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 ND 134 - State v. Schmidt

State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · United States v. Gorman · United States v. Clayton · United States v. Route · Valdez v. McPheters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A district court's findings of fact on a motion to suppress will not be reversed if there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the court's findings, and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.