Peterka v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Adams v. Illinois · Commonwealth v. Davidson · State v. Multaler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An applicant for post-conviction relief is only 'entitled to an evidentiary hearing if a reasonable inference raises a genuine issue of material fact.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Van Chase v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.