Brooks v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. Solberg · Kartes v. Kartes · Green v. Green · Sweeney v. Kirby · Jensen v. Jensen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This Court’s review of [a] case is significantly hampered by the district court’s failure to make specific, detailed findings on the relevant issues and law to be applied and its failure to expressly delineate the basis for its decision. ‘A reviewing court needs to know the reasons for the trial court’s decision before it can intelligently rule on the issues, and if the trial court does not provide an adequate explanation of the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision we are left to merely speculate whether the court properly applied the law.’ The lack of findings in the district court’s order does little to explain the rationale for the court’s ulti- ■ mate determination that the motion ... should be denied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Horning
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.