Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 ND 196 - State v. Kardor

State v. Kardor’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Steffes · State v. Bisner · United States of Americaappellee V Euka Wadlingtonappellant · State v. Sevigny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.