Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 ND 231 - Greywind v. State

Greywind v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chisholm v. State · State v. Raulston · Sambursky v. State · Wong v. State · Riak v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The court, on its own motion, may enter a judgment denying a meritless application on any and all issues raised in the application before any response by the state. The court also may summarily deny a second or successive application for similar relief on behalf of the same applicant and may summarily deny any application when the issues raised in the application have previously been decided by the appellate court in the same case. .... 3. The court may grant a motion by either party for summary disposition if the application, pleadings, any previous proceeding, discovery, or other matters of record show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]rgument, citations, and discussion of authorities are unnecessary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.