Olson v. Levi’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In State v. Birchfield, 2015 ND 6, ¶ 19 , 858 N.W.2d 302 , we held the criminal refusal statute' is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Const. art. I, § 8. In Beylund v. Levi, 2015 ND 18, ¶¶ 30-31 , 859 N.W.2d 403 , we held the implied consent law does not violate the' doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. In State v. Baxter, 2015 ND 107, ¶¶ 13-17 , 863 N.W.2d 208 , we held 'the criminal refusal statutes do not violate' a defendant’s due process rights. 'Recently, in State v. Kordonowy, 2015 ND 197, ¶¶ 15-19 , 867 N.W.2d 690 , we held the criminal refusal statutes are not unconstitutionally vague. [Defendant’s] arguments' do. not convince us-to revisit .these issues,””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schmidt v. Levi

2. “determin[ing] whether there were reasonable grounds to believe the person was driving or was in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, whether the person was properly tested, and whether the person's blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sutton v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation