2015 Pa. Super. 183 - Commonwealth v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Eskridge · 281 Pa. Super. 392 - Commonwealth v. Miller · Commonwealth v. Spotz · Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance · 2002 Pa. Super. 164 - Commonwealth v. Sims
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecution is barred when an actual conflict of interest affecting the prosecutor exists in the case; under such circumstances a defendant need not prove actual prejudice in order to require that the conflict be removed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“individual rather than vicarious disqualification is the general rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.