2015 Pa. Super. 191 - Commonwealth v. Mauz’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Karis v. Karis · Commonwealth v. Hock · Appeal of H.R. · Commonwealth v. Fedorek · 366 Pa. Super. 575 - Commonwealth v. Roth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: [[Image here]] (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.