2015 Pa. Super. 2 - Commonwealth v. Tejada’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Sanchez · Commonwealth v. Duca · 2004 Pa. Super. 334 - Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez · 2014 Pa. Super. 102 - Commonwealth v. Buterbaugh · 2014 Pa. Super. 182 - Commonwealth v. Lawrence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he facts and circumstances established by the Commonwealth need not preclude every possibility of innocence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must determine whether the evidence admitted at trial, and all reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, was sufficient to enable the fact finder to conclude that the Commonwealth established all of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The Commonwealth may sustain its burden by means of wholly circumstantial evidence. Further, the trier of fact is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“where the issues raised assail the trial court's exercise of discretion in fashioning the defendant's sentence, the trial court must be given the opportunity to reconsider the imposition of the sentence either through the defendant raising the issue at sentencing or in a post-sentence motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.