2015 Pa. Super. 261 - Commonwealth v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Padilla v. Kentucky · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Breard v. Greene · Missouri v. Frye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Had [Oliver's] counsel been solely responsible for the failure to file a Rule 1925(b) statement on [Oliver's] behalf, [he] would have been entitled to a remand for the filing of a Rule 1925(b) statement pursuant to Rule 1925(c)(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.