Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT 12 - State v. Earl

State v. Earl’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Kirby v. Illinois · Ake v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at or after the time that adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against him”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “scrutiny applies absent a suspect class or fundamental right at issue, and requires only that the statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “so generally problematic (and so unlikely to be reasonable) that [it] trigger(s] heightened scrutiny,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.