Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT 2 - State v. Strieff

State v. Strieff’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Brown v. Illinois · Dunaway v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[i]f the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the information ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means ... then the deterrence rationale has so little basis that the evidence should be received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to circumstances involving an independent act of a defendant's 'free will' in confessing to a crime or consenting to a search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]he terms and conditions of the exclusionary rule have been meted out by the Supreme Court in a piecemeal ... fashion,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.