State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 21 (§ 11 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Toussie v. United States · United States v. Scop · United States v. Read · United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher · United States v. Ashdown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“begins to run when a crime is 'committed.' " 2015 UT 42 , ¶ 12, 349 P.3d 696 (citation omitted). However, "the Legislature has structured the elements of some offenses in such a way that a perpetrator continues to commit the offense so long as he continues to satisfy the elements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart“criminal liability attaches when every element is satisfied, [but] the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the perpetrator ceases to satisfy the elements of the crime. At that point, the whole arc of criminal conduct is aggregated into a single criminal violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart“On interlocutory review, we recount the facts as alleged and in a light most favorable to the ruling below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.