State v. Steed’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (§ 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)
Relies on Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · State v. Menzies · Eldridge v. Johndrow · State v. Baker · Baird v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) for this mootness exception is not met. Issues that are likely to evade judicial review are those that are inherently short in duration such that a court will likely be unable to hear the issue when it still presents a live controversy....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Poulton v. Cox“that we should overrule McBride . We decline to do so, however, because neither party has asked us to overrule the case nor argued that it applies in the manner that [the concurrence] suggests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We should tread cautiously in overruling precedent and this is especially true where the parties have failed to brief or even argue that a particular precedent should be overruled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.