Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT 88 - State v. Bond

State v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

73 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unpreserved federal constitutional claims are not subject to a heightened review standard but are to be reviewed under our plain error doctrine.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An error is harmful if, absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, if our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.