Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 112 - State v. Moore

2015 UT App 112 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc. · Specht v. Jensen · State v. Maestas · State v. Low

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court's refusal to grant a lesser included offense instruction is a question of law, which we review for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will affirm when the instructions taken as a whole fairly instruct the jury on the law applicable to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.