Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 144 - Hamblin v. State

2015 UT App 144 - Hamblin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Lucero · State v. Lee · Ross v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “¶13 The State asserted that Trial Counsel's ineffectiveness could be addressed only in the context of a claim that Appellate Counsel was ineffective for failing to raise issues on appeal. That is, McCloud had to show that Appellate Counsel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a person may be eligible for relief on a basis that the ground could have been but was not raised at trial or on appeal, if the failure to raise that ground was due to ineffective assistance of counsel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “we must examine the merits of the claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel to determine if appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.