2015 UT App 161 - Brown v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kimball v. Kimball · Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc. · Ellis v. Swensen · Hardinger v. Kimberly · DeBry v. Cascade Enterprises
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Findings are clearly erroneous only if they are in conflict with the clear weight of the evidence, or if this court has a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We will not disturb a [district] court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We review the legal sufficiency of factual findings-that is, whether the [district] court's factual findings are sufficient to support its legal conclusions-under a correction-of-error standard, according no particular deference to the [district] court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lay v. Lay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.