Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 179 - State v. Hare

2015 UT App 179 - State v. Hare’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Lafler v. Cooper · State v. Dunn · State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is raised for the first time on appeal, there is no lower court ruling to review and we must decide whether [the] defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both 'that counsel's performance was deficient and 'that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.