Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 2 - Bartlett v. Bartlett

2015 UT App 2 - Bartlett v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2007 UT App 291 - Andrus v. Andrus · R.B. v. L.B. · In Re Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]ailure to provide adequate findings is reversible error when the facts are not clear from the record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'evenly balanced' " in all respects but concluded that the mother was " 'better able and equipped to support and sustain a positive relationship between [the children] and their father' " and that the father had " 'not shown a similar propensity.' " Id. (alteration in original). ¶29 On appeal, this court acknowledged that the district court "admirably detailed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'better able and equipped to support and sustain a positive relationship between the [children] and their father,' " but the district court "identified no subsidiary facts supporting this finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.