Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 23 - State v. Samul

2015 UT App 23 - State v. Samul’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manning v. State · State v. Brooks · State v. Rodrigues · State v. Candedo · State v. Ostler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “claimed remorse for his conduct, his efforts at rehabilitation, and his character and work ethic”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “neglected to inform [Samul] of his right to appeal and of the time period in which to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “make a statement in mitigation or explanation after conviction but before sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.