2015 UT App 235 - State v. Maama’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · Layton City v. Carr · State v. Fedorowicz · State v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As you heard earlier today, we had our little discussion about notes and this is why you shouldn't rely too heavily on notes because I'm not so confident that anybody is right or wrong. Luckily in this situation you have the witness on the stand who clarified himself and it's up to you to remember his testimony the way you remember it and never be overconfident in your notes. Okay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we refuse to re-evaluate the credibility of witnesses or second-guess the jury's conclusion.” (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 7 . Crespo did not address the prejudice element -other than to state that, absent a cautionary instruction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crespo“Oh, stop. [Inaudible] I rolled my eyes equally for the Defense and Prosecution, because everybody's witnesses had a few eye-rolling moments. All right, I will watch it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.