Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 243 - State v. Cheek

2015 UT App 243 - State v. Cheek’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon · People v. Doolin · State v. Dunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must demonstrate as a threshold matter that the defense attorney was required to make a choice advancing [another's] interests to the detriment of [the defendant's] interests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Hypothetical or speculative conflicts will not suffice to establish a violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.