2015 UT App 254 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on State v. Holgate · Shawn Owens v. William E. Boyd, Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center · Winward v. State · Taylor v. State · Merkley v. Beaslin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“upon any ground that ... could have been but was not raised at trial or on appeal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court found that all of the pertinent facts supporting [Brown's] ineffective assistance claims were known to [Brown] before he entered his pleas and that more than one year had passed before [Brown] filed his PCRA petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the time for filing begins to run when the petitioner knows or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known the evidentiary facts and not when the petitioner recognizes their legal significance .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.