2015 UT App 255 - State v. Bunker’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · Patterson v. Patterson · State v. Helms · 2003 UT App 432 - State v. Valdovinos · 2011 UT App 229 - State v. Epling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is the defendant's burden to demonstrate that the trial court failed to properly consider legally relevant factors,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the record shows that the trial court has reviewed information regarding the relevant legal factors, we can infer that the trial court adequately considered those factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ainsworth“we will not assume that the [sentencing] court's silence, by itself, presupposes that the court did not consider the proper factors as required by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.