State v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Clark · Archuleta v. Galetka · State v. Munguia · State v. Lee · State v. Bredehoft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To. succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must 'establish that his counsel rendered a deficient performance in some demonstrable manner, which performance fell below an objective standard of reasonable professional judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be available only upon a nonspeculative 'allegation of facts, not fully appearing in the record on appeal, which, if true, could support a determination that counsel was ineffective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There are four basic requirements for obtaining a 23B remand. First, the motion must be supported by affidavits setting forth facts that are not contained in the existing record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.