Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 30 - State v. Black

2015 UT App 30 - State v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hamilton · State v. Robbins · State v. Heaps · State v. Musselman · State v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “11 A court may reverse a jury verdict on a motion to arrest judgment only when "the evidence is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable such that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime for which he or she was convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the evidence presented is conflicting or disputed, the jury serves as the exclusive judge of both the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given to particular evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'The existence of a conflict in the evidence does not render the totality of the evidence insuffi-clent. It is the role of the factfinder to examine and resolve such conflicts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.