2015 UT App 48 - State v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “must do three things: first, consider the objection raised; second, make findings on the record regarding the accuracy of the information at issue; and third, determine on the record the relevance of that mformatmn as it relates to sentencing.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Post · State v. Vict. Asta

2. “[w]e are not convinced that the district court's failure to resolve Defendant's objections requires reversal and resentencing,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Vict. Asta · 2016 UT App 22 - State v. Abelon

3. “it fell short on its set-ond and third obligations when it failed to indicate on the record its determinations of accuracy and relevance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2016 UT App 22 - State v. Abelon