2015 UT App 49 - State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Caballes · Brendlin v. California · State v. Fuller · State v. Alverez · State v. Purser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“creates reasonable suspicion if the information (1) is reliable, (2) provides sufficient detail of the criminal activity, and (3) is confirmed by the investigating officer.”); see also State v. Street, 2011 UT App 111, ¶ 7 , 251 P.3d 862 (applying the same test). But in light of the Utah Supreme Court’s decision State v. Saddler, 2004 UT 105 , 104 P.3d 1265 ) rigid application of these three factors is not mandated. Id. ¶¶ 9 -10. Saddler determined that this court had”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.