State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Candedo · State v. Yazzie · Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc. · 2011 UT App 27 - State v. Waterfield · State v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[An legal sentence is] one which is ambiguous with respect to the time and manner in which it is to be served, is internally contradictory, omits a term required to be imposed by statute, is uncertain as to the © substance of the sentence, or is a sentence which the Judgment of conviction did not authorize.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kropf
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.