Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ARK 182 - Stokes v. Stokes

Stokes v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood · First Nat. Bank of Crossett v. Griffin · Cochran v. Bentley · McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. · First National Bank of DeWitt v. Cruthis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any civil action to recover on an open account, statement of account, account stated, promissory note, bill, negotiable instrament, or contract relating to the purchase or sale of goods, wares, or merchandise, or for labor or services, or breach of contract, unless otherwise provided by law or the contract which is the subject 1 ^matter of the action, the prevailing party may be allowed a reasonable attorney’s fee to be assessed by the court and collected as costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We ... acknowledge that the fees are permitted when a breach-of-contract action seeks equitable remedies such as specific performance. See, e.g., Childs v. Adams, 322 Ark. 424 , 909 S.W.2d 641 (1995). But this court has stated that the statute does not authorize fees when the claim merely has some connection to a contract. See, e.g., City of Little Rock v. Hudson, 366 Ark. 415 , 236 S.W.3d 509 (2006).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.