Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ARK 249 - Wertz v. State

Wertz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Woodson v. North Carolina · Jurek v. Texas · Romano v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish the extraordinary circumstances that would warrant the recall of a mandate or the reopening of a case, we have enumerated certain factors to be considered, namely (1) the presence of a defect in the appellate process, (2) a dismissal of proceedings in federal court because of unexhausted state-court claims, and (3) the appeal is a death case that required heightened scrutiny.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the trial court failed in its obligation to bring to the jury's attention a matter essential to its consideration of the death penalty[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an error alleged to have been made by this court during the course of its appellate review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.