Wertz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Woodson v. North Carolina · Jurek v. Texas · Romano v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish the extraordinary circumstances that would warrant the recall of a mandate or the reopening of a case, we have enumerated certain factors to be considered, namely (1) the presence of a defect in the appellate process, (2) a dismissal of proceedings in federal court because of unexhausted state-court claims, and (3) the appeal is a death case that required heightened scrutiny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the trial court failed in its obligation to bring to the jury's attention a matter essential to its consideration of the death penalty[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State“an error alleged to have been made by this court during the course of its appellate review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.