Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ARK 98 - Van Winkle v. State

Van Winkle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Washington v. Recuenco · Howard v. State · Mancia v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “specifying any parts of the files, or records that are relied upon to sustain the court's findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.