Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ARKAPP 204 - Todd v. State

Todd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lambert v. State · State v. Webb · 2010 Ark. App. 645 - Ivy v. Arkansas Department of Human Services · 2015 Ark. App. 356 - Todd v. State · 80 Ark. App. 133 - Chadwell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The legislature is presumed to be familiar with the appellate courts' interpretation of its statutes, and it can amend a statute if it disagrees with those interpretations; absent such an amendment, the interpretation of the statute remains the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.