Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ARKAPP 262 - Worsham v. Day

Worsham v. Day’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance · National Home Centers, Inc. v. Coleman · Hoyle v. Faucher · McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies · McGhee v. STATE BD. OF COLLECTION AGENCIES

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judgment or order is effective only when so set forth and entered as provided in Administrative Order No. 2,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.