Lindsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2012 Ark. App. 329 - D.D.R. v. State · 104 Ark. App. 280 - Magana-Galdamez v. State · 2010 Ark. App. 744 - Neal v. State · 2016 Ark. App. 198 - Kiser v. State · 2009 Ark. App. 710 - J.S. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the court did not weigh one factor the way [the appellant] wanted it weighed does not make the court's decision clearly erroneous, nor does it necessitate reversal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holmes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.