Container Store v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1202 · 19 U.S.C. § 1515 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 1581 · 28 U.S.C. § 2637 · 28 U.S.C. § 2640 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · United States v. Mead Corp. · Hubbard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“tp]arts of general use as defined in note 2 to section XV.” Note 2 to section XV, which covers articles of base metal, states that the phrase ”[p]arts of general use” includes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“9403 Other furniture and parts thereof: 9403.90 Parts: 9403.90.80 Other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.