Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 CO 69 - Johnson v. People

Johnson v. People’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bostelman v. People · People v. Steen · People v. Chard · People v. Sisneros

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If privileged information is not 'made available' by the privilege-holder, nothing in the statute gives the trial court the power to force a party to disclose privileged information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a remedy on appeal would prove inadequate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.