People v. Relaford’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Michael MILLER · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. · People v. Czemerynski · People v. Quintana · Tevlin v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this fact alone is insufficient to deny admission of the evidence, because expert testimony generally tends to bolster or attack the credibility of another witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because it assists the jury in understanding the victim's behavior after the incident —why the victim acted the way he or she did”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may incidentally give rise to an inference that a victim is or is not telling the truth about the specific incident,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.