Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ILAPP(1ST) 150433 - Prospect Development, LLC v. Kreger

Prospect Development, LLC v. Kreger’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 179 Ill. 2d 367 - Best v. Taylor MacHine Works · 223 Ill. 2d 49 - DeLuna v. Burciaga · 197 Ill. 2d 381 - Nowak v. St. Rita High School · 227 Ill. 2d 343 - Porter v. Decatur Memorial Hospital · 78 Ill. 2d 1 - Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The minimum threshold requirements for the application of collateral estoppel are: (1) the issue decided in the prior adjudication is identical with the one presented in the suit in question, (2) there was a final judgment on the merits in the prior adjudication, and (3) the party against whom estoppel is asserted was a party or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication. [Citations.] Application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel must be narrowly tailored to fit the precise facts and issues that were clearly determined in the prior judgment. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Collateral estoppel is an equitable doctrine, also referred to as issue preclusion, which 'promotes fairness and judicial economy by preventing the relitigation of issues that have already been resolved in earlier actions.' [Citation.] It applies when some controlling fact or question material to the determination of both causes has been adjudicated against the party in the former suit by a court of competent jurisdiction. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.