Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ILAPP(2D) 140792 - People v. Buffkin

People v. Buffkin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · 168 Ill. 2d 107 - People v. Arna · 242 Ill. 2d 285 - People v. Marshall · 221 Ill. 2d 338 - In Re JT · 129 Ill. 2d 303 - People v. Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) Insubstantial and Substantial Errors on Appeal. Any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded. Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the trial court. (b) Powers of the Reviewing Court. On appeal the reviewing court may: (1) reverse, affirm, or modify the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken[.]" Ill. S. Ct. R. 615.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This is a collateral appeal, and, beyond the dismissal itself, defendant is strictly limited in what he may raise. He may raise any claim that may be raised at any time. But he may not collaterally attack his sentence as statutorily unauthorized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.